Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> I'm fixing the current design of the dialog. Whether the design should
>> be changed is the next question ?
>
> It should have been changed long ago. Maybe you'll find the time. The
> current design is only a burden of the past.
>
I w
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think we really need OK/Apply/Cancel buttons in the long term (there's
> also an old bug report somewhere).
>
+1
C.
--
http://www.kde-france.org
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I'm fixing the current design of the dialog. Whether the design should
> be changed is the next question ?
It should have been changed long ago. Maybe you'll find the time. The current
design is only a burden of the past.
> PS. I removed the new policy again, beca
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> Solving:
> - The GuiTabular dialog has an auto-apply policy. The buttoncontroller
> however changes the Close button into Cancel, while pressing Cancel does
i'm really happy you looked into this, as Uwe says in #1699 we are the only
word processor where you appl
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Solving:
> - The GuiTabular dialog has an auto-apply policy. The buttoncontroller
> however changes the Close button into Cancel, while pressing Cancel does
> apply the settings. Therefore I added a new ButtonPolicy: AutoApplyPolicy.
I think we really need OK/Apply/
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
Solving:
- The GuiTabular dialog has an auto-apply policy. The buttoncontroller
however changes the Close button into Cancel, while pressing Cancel
does apply the settings. Therefore I added a new ButtonPolicy:
AutoApplyPolicy.
- When editing the width edit fie
Solving:
- The GuiTabular dialog has an auto-apply policy. The buttoncontroller
however changes the Close button into Cancel, while pressing Cancel does
apply the settings. Therefore I added a new ButtonPolicy: AutoApplyPolicy.
- When editing the width edit field is not finished by an enter but