Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-07-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote: | > Georg Baum wrote: | > >The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and | > >works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. | > >Jean-Marc, also for 1.4

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-07-04 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > >The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and > >works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. > >Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? > > atm i cannot compile lyx out of the box on my debi

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-07-04 Thread Edwin Leuven
Georg Baum wrote: The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? atm i cannot compile lyx out of the box on my debian unstable, and i need georg's patch (updated one attached) why not pu

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-06-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> I think we should if that means to support a newer release of a Georg> tool, because that will sooner or later appear in a stable Georg> distribution. I agree that we don't need to support prereleases Georg> of tools. But we should no

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-06-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I think we should if that means to support a newer release of a tool, | because that will sooner or later appear in a stable distribution. I | agree that we don't need to support prereleases of tools. We are in agreement then. -- Lgb

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-06-03 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 11:08 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > 2.59d is not a proper release is it? I thought it was, but I looked it up, and it is not, so I am not going to put this in but keep it locally. > I am not sure that we should cater at all for test distributions, be > it debian testin

Re: [patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-06-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and | works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. | Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? I am not sure that we should do this. 2.59d is not a proper release is it? I am not sure that we

[patch] Accept autoconf 2.59[a-d]

2006-06-03 Thread Georg Baum
The subject says it all. autoconf 2.59d is used in debian testing and works fine. This is going in tomorrow if nobody objects. Jean-Marc, also for 1.4? Georg Index: autogen.sh === --- autogen.sh (Revision 13983) +++ autogen.sh (Arbe