On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My last trip a few weeks ago was Berlin-London for ~50 EUR (one way,
> including taxes) with a company called "buzz" and it was ok. No food on
> board (well, there was, but you would have to pay extra) but I really don't
> care about that for a two hours
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 04:36:43PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
> > seen Frankfurt-Glasgow for 7 EUR...
>
> How much extra for a seat?
> And how much on top of that for a seat belt?
> And how much more on top of that for a pr
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> > lottery.
>
> Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
No the price for spending my life upside down
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 02:14:32PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
> lottery.
Is that the price of spending the whole life upside down?
I wonder whether RyanAir will go beyond Europe some time. Yesterday I've
seen Frankfurt-Glasgow
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Currently it looks like neither Asger, Angus and John could come if we
> insisted June 20th.
>
> Currently I have (5 - "ok", 0 - "not ok"):
I think I'm going to be a 0 for all dates this year unless I win the
lottery. I am however making good progress o
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
OK, my response follows in the first column:
> Lars John José
0 > 131
0 > May 3105
0 > May10105
0 > May17105
0 > May24105
0 > June1155
0 > June8
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 02:28:25PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> No, I mean the list with the dates you might be able to come to
> Andre> Chemnitz.
>
> Can you wait until tomorrow?
Sure.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor d
On Friday 07 February 2003 1:17 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre> PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the dates, too?
> >
> > We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is what I
> > use to make th
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the
Andre> dates, too?
>> We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is
>> what I use to m
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:49:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> PS: Jean-Marc, could you fill in the list with the dates, too?
>
> We have the ChangeLogs for that already, don't we? The list is what I
> use to make the list of features in the announcement. What we could
> add though
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Sure. It fixes nothing since André can cope equally well with
Angus> both \(...\) and $...$. He merely said that he'd prefer to
Angus> receive math as it is in the original LaTeX file.
Let's drop it, then.
JMarc
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:51:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Sure. It fixes nothing since André can cope equally well with both \(...\)
> and $...$. He merely said that he'd prefer to receive math as it is in the
> original LaTeX file.
And the only reason for that is the goal of a lossless .
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
Ok to apply? And to 1.3.x?
>>> I would say apply it for 1.4.x. Regarding 1.3.x we should be
>>> paranoid. ;-) (by Jean:marc advice's) ;-)
>
> Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in m
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
>> What kind of problems does it fix? We have to weight the
>> risk/benefit ratio.
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:43:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
>
> What kind of problems does it fix? We have to weight the risk/benefit
> ratio.
I think having it just for 1.4 is ok.
Andre'
PS: Jean-Marc, could you
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Ok to apply? And to 1.3.x?
>> I would say apply it for 1.4.x. Regarding 1.3.x we should be
>> paranoid. ;-) (by Jean:marc advice's) ;-)
Angus> Ok, I'll apply it to 1.4.x and store the patch in my 1.3.x dir.
What kind of problems doe
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2003 11:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
>> '$ blah$$ foo $
>> problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
>>
>> It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether
>>
On Friday 07 February 2003 11:39, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
> '$ blah$$ foo $
> problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
>
> It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether to
> enter or leave math mode
This one has been in my tree for a while. It does not fix the
'$ blah$$ foo $
problem, but it doesn't break anything either.
It works by setting a switch, $inside_math, so that reLyX knows whether to
enter or leave math mode when it receives a '$' or '$$' token.
Ok to apply? And to 1.3.
19 matches
Mail list logo
