>> Alas, the last time I looked at Texmacs (a few months ago) it
>> looked pretty well, but that doesn't change the fact that the
>> basic functionality was destined for a math-typing secretary.
>> Probably that's not a bad thing in itself, yet...
>
> TeXmacs looks good, but it is unusable for
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:13:20AM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote:
> Alas, the last time I looked at Texmacs (a few months ago) it looked pretty
> well, but that doesn't change the fact that the basic functionality was
> destined for a math-typing secretary. Probably that's not a bad thing in
> itself,
On wtorek 12 listopad 2002 09:45 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Some people have time to loose...
Don't we all hate anonymouse mailings ;-))
Alas, the last time I looked at Texmacs (a few months ago) it looked pretty
well, but that doesn't change the fact that the basic functionality was
des
Some people have time to loose...
JMarc
--- Begin Message ---
Texmacs User ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) entered the
following feedback message on the LyX home page:
Why do you folks continue to develop LyX? Texmacs is a fa
