Am Freitag, 10. September 2004 16:06 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Georg Baum wrote:
> >>> %define frontdep @RPM_FRONTEND_DEPS@ %(eval
> >>> %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/development/find_dep)
> >>
> >> Can you not define it in the spec file itself? I have this in the spec
> >>
Georg Baum wrote:
>> Georg Baum wrote:
>>
>>> %define frontdep @RPM_FRONTEND_DEPS@ %(eval
>>> %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/development/find_dep)
>>
>> Can you not define it in the spec file itself? I have this in the spec
>> file for XForms (below). Can one not define arbitrary shell scripts i
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>
>> %define frontdep @RPM_FRONTEND_DEPS@ %(eval
>> %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/development/find_dep)
>
> Can you not define it in the spec file itself? I have this in the spec
> file for XForms (below). Can one not define arbitrary shell scripts in a
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Georg> I searched a bit and saw in an example that "or" is supported
Georg> (at least in rpm 4.1.1), but Angus' script is better.
>> Could you se
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> I searched a bit and saw in an example that "or" is supported
> Georg> (at least in rpm 4.1.1), but Angus' script is better.
>
> Could you send a reference on that?
I found it in /usr/s
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Requires: tetex-latex | te_latex
>> As far as I know it does not, unfortunately.
Georg> I searched a bit and saw in an example that "or" is supported
Georg> (at least in rpm 4.1.1), but Angus' script is better.
Could you send a refe
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:41:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Yes, but if the library is not installed, rpm does not know IMO what
> package provides libqt-mt.so.3. And also, no version checking is done.
> Here we will get on mandrake
> libqt3 >= 3.3.1
> for example.
Guys:
You can ma
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:41:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, but if the library is not installed, rpm does not know IMO what
> package provides libqt-mt.so.3.
We don't now either given that distributions name their packages
differently.
Andre'
Georg Baum wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>>> We could do the same and ask which package provides `which latex`.
>>
>> Clever! It even works. In fact, could the script below be modified so
>> that all continues to work if latex is found but is also found to no
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> We could do the same and ask which package provides `which latex`.
>
> Clever! It even works. In fact, could the script below be modified so that
> all continues to work if latex is found but is also found to not be a part
> of an rpm?
The
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> We could do the same and ask which package provides `which latex`.
Indeed.
> Georg> Why is the manual dependency of qt needed at all? IIRC rpm
> Georg> handles library dependencies automatically, so we don't need to
> Georg> specify qt and xforms at all, because rpm
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an
>>> annoying bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'.
>>> However, the package
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an
>> annoying bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'.
>> However, the package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE
>> it
> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an annoying
> bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'. However, the
> package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE it is 'qt3' and
> on mandrake it is 'libqt3'. This proves to be an annoyance for our
> user-contribu
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an annoying
> bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'. However, the
> package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE it is 'qt3' and
> on mandrake it is 'libqt3'. This proves to be an anno
The current autogenerated lyx.spec for rpms suffers from an annoying
bug: The dependency for Qt is hardcoded to 'qt >= 2.3.0'. However, the
package is named 'qt' only on redhat/fedora. On SUSE it is 'qt3' and
on mandrake it is 'libqt3'. This proves to be an annoyance for our
user-contributed rpms
16 matches
Mail list logo
