Re: [announce] first preview test release of LyX 1.6 for Windows

2008-03-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, I'll change the numbering scheme. Thanks.

Re: [announce] first preview test release of LyX 1.6 for Windows

2008-03-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: Should I stop releasing from time to time development snapshots that are not official betas? No, but I think that the term snapshot is better suited than test release. But the mail I sent states in the first sentence clearly: "I uploaded a first snapshot of the

Re: [announce] first preview test release of LyX 1.6 for Windows

2008-03-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This release is nor an official prerelease and not meant as such. I > just did the same as in the LyX 1.5svn development cycle. Should I > stop releasing from time to time development snapshots that are not > official betas? No, but I think that the term sna

Re: [announce] first preview test release of LyX 1.6 for Windows

2008-03-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb: Uwe, I think it would be better to wait for everybody else and do an alpha when there is an official one. Your announcement looks like a kind of official release. This release is nor an official prerelease and not meant as such. I just did the same as in the LyX

Re: [announce] first preview test release of LyX 1.6 for Windows

2008-03-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I uploaded a first snapshot of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows. Uwe, I think it would be better to wait for everybody else and do an alpha when there is an official one. Your announcement looks like a kind of official release. JMarc