> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> rotate-textures was there to assure that the genmisc-package was
Uwe> used which was once required by powerdot. Attached a better
Uwe> patch.
I do not see the layout file in the new patch. Is it unchanged? If you
test for the presence of s
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I corrected all issues in the attached better patch.
Good. However, wait for Jean-Marc's comment before committing.
Jürgen
>> Attached is the patch. The powerdot.layout requires to check for three
>> packages in the file "chkconfig.ltx" but this is unproblematic I think.
>
> Why are rotate-textures and listings required?
rotate-textures was there to assure that the genmisc-package was used which was once required by
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Attached is the patch. The powerdot.layout requires to check for three
> packages in the file "chkconfig.ltx" but this is unproblematic I think.
Why are rotate-textures and listings required? The powerdot documentation does
not list that in the dependencies table (but it does p
Bo:
>> I think so so please add a bug report and ask Jose to add it.
José:
> Submit it to the list where it can be discussed. I don't have any problem
> adding new layout files at any stage as long as it does not imply new code,
> and it follows our guidelines...
Attached is the patch. The powerd
> Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
> filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Note that the file names are not different.
AltInstaller...
Just for my insterest: When you can do this for Joost's installer it should be
possible also with
mine, right?
Y
Bo Peng schrieb:
Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Note that the file names are not different.
- I ship the powerdot.layout and maintain it also because I often got
requests for this, the last
time this week. I st
On Friday 18 May 2007 6:30:56 pm Bo Peng wrote:
> I think so so please add a bug report and ask Jose to add it.
Submit it to the list where it can be discussed. I don't have any problem
adding new layout files at any stage as long as it does not imply new code,
and it follows our guidelines...
I missed this fact. So what should be the name to announce it?
Something like 'an alternative windows installer with blah blah', with
filenames lyx-1.5.0beta3-AltInstaller
Do you really want to have it on the LyX-server? If yes, there are two issues:
As long as your installers are not of
Bo Peng schrieb:
As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc to
upload it to the lyx server?
I missed this fact. So what should be the name to announce it?
Do you really want to have it on the LyX-server? I
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> Hi, Uwe,
Bo> As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
Bo> installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc
Bo> to upload it to the lyx server? Putting two installers side by
Bo> side can confuse people
I uploaded an installer for LyX 1.5beta3:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=12796
Hi, Uwe,
As your installer has become half-official and named 'alternative
installer' in svn, why cannot you announce it as so and ask JMarc to
upload it to the lyx server
Hello LyXers,
I uploaded an installer for LyX 1.5beta3:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5117&release_id=12796
Changelog to last development snapshot:
Version LyX 1.5beta3-18-05-2007
- LyX 1.5 beta3 from 18-05-2007
- fix bug, introduced with last version, that all m
13 matches
Mail list logo
