On 19 Oct 1999 23:09:24 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In an ideal world where you have plenty of time and diligence to maintain
>any macro set (Imake, autoconf, tmake, ... whatever) actively for wide
>portability, it might be desirable. In the real world, although you may
>see quite noticeabl
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But this is not an imminent problem, though. On the _very_ long run, I
> think, the process of building and configuring LyX should not be forked
> into several different scripting languages. Best thing would be a
> uniform and consistent method, which sh
On 13 Oct 1999 05:41:35 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The debug code
>say size;'cmd/c dir chkconfig.sed';
>checks if the arguments to stream() is all right, and it seems OK.
>The stream() line is setting the pointer to the end of the file
Ahh... This might be my idiosyncrasy, but with Rexx I'
The debug code
say size;'cmd/c dir chkconfig.sed';
checks if the arguments to stream() is all right, and it seems OK.
The stream() line is setting the pointer to the end of the file
chkconfig.sed
With procedural REXX (non ANSI)
rc=stream('chkconfig.sed','c','seek + 'size)
is correct and
On Sun, 03 Oct 1999 10:57:42 -0400, Yang Dehua wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Yang Dehua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > >
>> > > > 132 +++ rc = stream('chkconfig.sed', 'c', 'seek +'size);
>> > > >REX0026: Error 26 running G:\xfree86\lib\x11\lyx\configure.cmd, line
>> > > >
On 2 Oct 1999 15:33:52 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>BTW Arnd, could you prepare binary distribution of 1.0.4, or do I have
>to do it myself?
Till now I've only installed emx0.9c, which is not particularly a
problem with LyX 1.0.4, but it might be the last release which can be
compiled with
