> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What about the simple solution of reintroducing Standard in the
>> broken layouts?
Georg> I thought you did not want to require Standard? This solution
Georg> is easy, but note that my first analysis was
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What about the simple solution of reintroducing Standard in the broken
> layouts?
I thought you did not want to require Standard? This solution is easy, but
note that my first analysis was wrong, it does not mean "reintroduce" but
"introduce". If we are going to do t
On Friday 03 February 2006 13:13, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> What about the simple solution of reintroducing Standard in the broken
> layouts?
That is the easy short term solution for several reasons.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Given the fact that 1.3.7 is already out with the broken lyx2lyx I
>> tend now to polish this and put it in 1.4.1, and for 1.4.0 to tell
>> users to do
What about the simple solution of reintroducing Standard in the broken
layouts?
JMar
On Saturday 28 January 2006 18:58, Georg Baum wrote:
> 2) Currently lyx2lyx refuses to run if it can't find the layout file, even
> if is not necessary at all. This could be refined to only bail out if the
> default layout is really needed.
I have been out last week and I have only seen this now
