Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 1/ use your shiny new combo for Layout box (to avoid doubly-defined stuff)
This is the long-term plan indeed.
> 2/ put your code into a namespace, presumably lyx::frontend.
Pavel did so, thankfully.
Jürgen
Le 24/11/2012 09:35, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Not directly related, but are you able to compile the current trunk via
monolithic build?
I didn't try. I read this message, but I don't know how to fix that.
1/ use your shiny new combo for Layout box (to avoid doubly-defi
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Not directly related, but are you able to compile the current trunk via
> monolithic build?
I didn't try. I read this message, but I don't know how to fix that.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Dear all
> >
> > I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and
> > I've come to a state where things work, but I need some help with
> > polishing, testing and finishing up the feature.
>
> Meanwhile, I have
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Would it be safe to use the latter and strip this off for the button?
Answering myself: yes it is. I've done that.
Jürgen
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> - there is a typo in the example for Requires (in the documentation),
> the second argument should be [arg]
Thanks. I'll correct that.
> - Why is the shortcut separate from the LabelString? Can't you just use
> the & notation? This seems easier for translators.
Ac
Le 23/11/2012 16:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I think it is a good idea to commit it so that everybody could actually
see/use it.
Done. Hope you like it.
It looks good. Two remarks
- there is a typo in the example for Requires (in the documentation),
the seco
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think it is a good idea to commit it so that everybody could actually
> see/use it.
Done. Hope you like it.
Jürgen
Le 23/11/2012 14:53, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dear all
I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and
I've come to a state where things work, but I need some help with
polishing, testing and finishing up the feature.
Meanwhile, I hav
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and
> I've come to a state where things work, but I need some help with
> polishing, testing and finishing up the feature.
Meanwhile, I have reached a state where I would like to merg
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> TODO:
[...]
> * layout2layout: bump the layout format and convert the old OptionalArgs
> and RequiredArgs items to the new scheme.
This is done at
http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/spitz/lyx.git;a=commit;h=98e8dfeffc010ffda9bf65961f97bb3290051232
Jürgen
I'll be happy to help work on this, as I've been interested in doing
this for a while. Once the semester is over
Richard
On 11/19/2012 09:03 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Dear all
I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and
I've come to a state where thi
Dear all
I have worked towards a revision of our LaTeX argument inset (bug 6753), and
I've come to a state where things work, but I need some help with polishing,
testing and finishing up the feature.
I've created a private repo (should be readable to all and writable to devs),
and pushed what
13 matches
Mail list logo
