Re: [PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript"

2013-05-31 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.05.2013 09:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >> Can I change "Postscript" to "PostScript" in all of the manuals? > > > You can change this in all examples and template files, in all Intro, > Tutorials, the Customization and the Additional.

Re: [PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript"

2013-05-30 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 29.05.2013 09:35, schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Can I change "Postscript" to "PostScript" in all of the manuals? You can change this in all examples and template files, in all Intro, Tutorials, the Customization and the Additional. The other manuals (Math, EmbeddedObjects and UserGuide) are cur

Re: [PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript"

2013-05-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> 11/04/2013 04:51, Scott Kostyshak: >> >>> From what I understand, "PostScript" is the correct way to write it. >>> >>> Does anyone have an opinion on this? >> >> >> Why not

Re: [PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript"

2013-04-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
7 00:00:00 2001 From: Scott Kostyshak Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:47:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript" --- lib/configure.py |6 +++--- lib/doc/EmbeddedObjects.lyx |2 +- lib/doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx

Re: [PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript"

2013-04-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
11/04/2013 04:51, Scott Kostyshak: From what I understand, "PostScript" is the correct way to write it. Does anyone have an opinion on this? Why not. If you go this way, "git grep" tells me that there are other places needing attention. JMarc

[PATCH] Spelling: "Postscript" -> "PostScript"

2013-04-10 Thread Scott Kostyshak
>From what I understand, "PostScript" is the correct way to write it. Does anyone have an opinion on this? Scott From 57122755eec3497c4bbe2215cc71b87be9ef8071 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Scott Kostyshak Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:47:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Spelling

Re: [Patch] spelling

2005-04-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > This goes in unless there are weighty reasons not to change silly > identifiers in CVS. Shout if you can think of any. > > - Martin > ...and here's the patch. - M Index: ChangeLog ==

[Patch] spelling

2005-04-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
This goes in unless there are weighty reasons not to change silly identifiers in CVS. Shout if you can think of any. - Martin pgpEPWcF5fLAw.pgp Description: PGP signature