> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:52:39PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> OK, it seems to work... Are there other places where this optional
>> argument UI is used?
Andre> No.
>> It is rather weird...
Andre> Propose somethi
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:52:39PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, it seems to work... Are there other places where this optional
> argument UI is used?
No.
> It is rather weird...
Propose something better. I don't like it myself.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in ord
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:50:17PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So the short version is something like "the argument of framebox is
> now considered as text, and a second optional argument is supported"?
Exactly.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
w
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Concerning your question how to check:
Andre> - content of framebox should be black - you should be able to
Andre> open a new nested math box in there by pressing C-m - you
Andre> should be able to use two optional args
OK, it see
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> There are two of them actually. I took the liberty of renaming
>> them, since they had the same name :)
Andre> Ok:
So the short version is something l
Concerning your question how to check:
- content of framebox should be black
- you should be able to open a new nested math box in there by pressing C-m
- you should be able to use two optional args
Andre'
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> There are two of them actually. I took the liberty of renaming them,
> since they had the same name :)
Ok:
+++ math_frameboxinset.C3 Mar 2003 11:55:05 -
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ MathInset * MathFrameboxIn
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:24:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: You are not seriously asking me about two weeks old
Andre> patch?
>> Yes I am. Of course, if your patch had a ChangeLog, life would be
>> easier. Or if yo
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:24:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> You are not seriously asking me about two weeks old patch?
>
> Yes I am. Of course, if your patch had a ChangeLog, life would be
> easier. Or if you actually added some useful english text to you mails
> explaining what
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:05:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Andre> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:56:01PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> >> please consi
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:05:33PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:56:01PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> >> please consider to apply this to 1.3.1cvs.
>
> Andre> Well, the second part should be
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:56:01PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> please consider to apply this to 1.3.1cvs.
Andre> Well, the second part should be safe as well. See attached.
OK, I applied ot to my tree, but what does it do exac
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:25:28PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: I did not know you were releasing 1.3.1 soon.
>> Well, the fixes are beginning to accumulate to a long list, and it
>> is probably a good time to flush th
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:25:28PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I did not know you were releasing 1.3.1 soon.
>
> Well, the fixes are beginning to accumulate to a long list, and it is
> probably a good time to flush the queue.
So just do that.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:27:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: please consider to apply this to 1.3.1cvs.
>> Do you really think it is needed _now_?
Andre> No.
>> Otherwose, I'd better wait for 1.3.2cvs.
Andre> 1.3
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:27:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> please consider to apply this to 1.3.1cvs.
>
> Do you really think it is needed _now_?
No.
> Otherwose, I'd better wait for 1.3.2cvs.
1.3.2cvs is fine with me.
> Actually, the main thing I would like to add to 1.3.
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Jean-Marc,
Andre> please consider to apply this to 1.3.1cvs.
Do you really think it is needed _now_? Otherwose, I'd better wait for
1.3.2cvs.
Actually, the main thing I would like to add to 1.3.1 is Dekel's
qfont_loader patch, a
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 12:56:01PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> please consider to apply this to 1.3.1cvs.
Well, the second part should be safe as well. See attached.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. J
Jean-Marc,
please consider to apply this to 1.3.1cvs.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
? tmp.diff
? 1.diff
? cut.diff
? crash.diff
? haveit
? script.diff
? all
? rmcopyright.sh
? .math_decora
19 matches
Mail list logo
