On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:55:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> What happens is, that we first define a "background font"
> Martin> against which the actual font will be reduced. It's
> Martin> initialized to the layo
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> What happens is, that we first define a "background font"
Martin> against which the actual font will be reduced. It's
Martin> initialized to the layout font, then completed with the
Martin> font(s) of paragraphs "above" it in a l
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 02:11:16PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Now, what is the "inset's font contribution" for the main
> Martin> text? Doesn't exist / is represented already by the buffer
> Martin> font.
>
> It co
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> With the articleX layout, if I select a keyword charcter style, I
> cannot set the color of a character to black (or it maybe that I can,
> but it does not show on screen).
I noticed this, too. However, it is not related to Martin's patch.
Jürgen
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin> wrote:
>> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Could you tell me in a few words why !isMainText() is needed?
Martin> It isn't ac
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Now, what is the "inset's font contribution" for the main
Martin> text? Doesn't exist / is represented already by the buffer
Martin> font.
It could be initialized to the layout default font + buffer language.
JMarc
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could you tell me in a few words why !isMainText() is needed?
It isn't actually needed... I tried without and seems to work OK. But
conversely allowing this call
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> So please, verify that this
>> works for an unmodified tree too.
>
> Yes, it seems to fix the problem for me too.
For me too.
Georg
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Remember this was the bug you sort-of-promised to sort-of
Martin> think about fixing in a better way than just disable font
Martin> changes insite charstyle insets?
I tried actually. I still have some patches in my tree (that di
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 09:20 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > So please, verify that this
> > works for an unmodified tree too.
>
> Yes, it seems to fix the problem for me too.
Lars, Jean-Marc, can this go in? It's non-critical, but also trivial and
well understood.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> So please, verify that this
> works for an unmodified tree too.
Yes, it seems to fix the problem for me too.
Jürgen
Remember this was the bug you sort-of-promised to sort-of think about
fixing in a better way than just disable font changes insite charstyle
insets?
Well, here is that fix. A fringe benefit of having to study the LyX font
architecture in all its byzantine glory to help out with Helge's blue
under
12 matches
Mail list logo