Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> Here is what I had in mind. Works quite well.
> >> Who would have guessed what the innocent commit of such esoteric lfun
> >> would trigger :)
> >
> > It is still small activity :) Does it work for you?
>
> Will try tomorrow.
Your patch work
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> This is what I come up with, if (!from.nextInset()) line is taken from
>> inset-forall but I have actually no idea what situation it handles.
>> Comments?
>
> This looks reasonable. The test you mention is to make sire that at any
> time the cursor is in front of an
Le 07/02/2018 à 20:12, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Something like what inset-forall does?
The idea is to use an InsetIterator (just a DocIterator that does
forwardInset() with operator++ and returns the inset with operator*. Then one
has to check the inset code by hand (which is not nice IMO).
But I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Here is what I had in mind. Works quite well.
>> Who would have guessed what the innocent commit of such esoteric lfun
>> would trigger :)
>
> It is still small activity :) Does it work for you?
Will try tomorrow.
>> But since I caught your attention, would you mi
