Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am in vacation ;) Abdelrazak> Oups sorry then, I should have waited for your approval as Abdelrazak> this toc code is apparently yours and Angus' So what you do (apart from moving code around) is

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : | > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | [...] | > | hum... my changes _were_ OK with you, _weren't_ they? | > Yes, I had now qualms with it. | | You mean "no qualms" right? Right, "right". -- Lgb

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I am in vacation ;) Abdelrazak> Oups sorry then, I should have waited for your approval as Abdelrazak> this toc code is apparently yours and Angus' So what you do (apart from moving code around) is to compute the toc at updat

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | hum... my changes _were_ OK with you, _weren't_ they? Yes, I had now qualms with it. You mean "no qualms" right?

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : | > Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : | >> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >> | >> | Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : | >> | > I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. | >> | | Done. | >>

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : | > I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. | | Done. | Weird that my patches do not generate heated discussions anymore... I | am w

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : | > I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. | | Done. | Weird that my patches do not generate heated discussions anymore... I | am wondering if they are just n

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : | > I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. | | Done. | Weird that my patches do not generate heated discussions anymore... I | am wondering if they are just not interesting... or maybe they a

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-22 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. Abdelrazak> Done. Weird that my patches do not generate heated Abdelrazak> discussions any

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-22 Thread Bo Peng
On 4/22/06, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : > > I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. > > Done. > Weird that my patches do not generate heated discussions anymore... I am > wondering if they are just not interesting... or may

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Abdelrazak> Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : >> I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean >> time. Abdelrazak> Done. Weird that my patches do not generate heated Abdelrazak> discussions anymore... I am wondering i

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-22 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. Done. Weird that my patches do not generate heated discussions anymore... I am wondering if they are just not interesting... or maybe they are just perfect? Just kidding :-) Abdel. Abdelrazak

Re: [Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-22 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
I'll put it in later today if there's no objection in the mean time. Abdel. Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : And with this yet another updated patch, the dialog will automatically update itself if a new section is created or modified or deleted... Even Microsoft Word doesn't do this correctly :-)

[Yet Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-21 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
And with this yet another updated patch, the dialog will automatically update itself if a new section is created or modified or deleted... Even Microsoft Word doesn't do this correctly :-) Abdel. Index: src/buffer_funcs.C === ---

[Updated Patch] Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-21 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : I found myself using more and more the two ways toc navigation but, eventually I got annoyed by the slowness of it. So I fixed it :-) This patch implements a Toc backend (TocBackend.[Ch]) that is used in toc.h. The speed improvement is _

Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-21 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Angus Leeming a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Just finished compiling with qt3 (always a penitence ) Is it still a penitence if you don't export all symbols in the .dll? Much less of a penitence (350Megs instead of >800Megs and much less time) but still I cannot do

Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just finished compiling with qt3 (always a penitence ) Is it still a penitence if you don't export all symbols in the .dll? Regards, Angus

Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-21 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit : I found myself using more and more the two ways toc navigation but, eventually I got annoyed by the slowness of it. So I fixed it :-) This patch implements a Toc backend (TocBackend.[Ch]) that is used in toc.h. The speed improvement is _very_ very nice on windows.

Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-21 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > This id need only be unique for the current lyx session right? | > then paragrpah::id() should be good enough. | | The problem is that this id is not constant across moves or depth | changes (as done by the outline

Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > This id need only be unique for the current lyx session right? | > then paragrpah::id() should be good enough. | | The problem is that this id is not constant across moves or depth | changes (as done by the outline function). Wait... I am not sure

Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-20 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit : Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I found myself using more and more the two ways toc navigation but, | eventually I got annoyed by the slowness of it. So I fixed it :-) | | This patch implements a Toc backend (TocBackend.[Ch]) that is used in | toc.

Re: [Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I found myself using more and more the two ways toc navigation but, | eventually I got annoyed by the slowness of it. So I fixed it :-) | | This patch implements a Toc backend (TocBackend.[Ch]) that is used in | toc.h. The speed improvement is _very

[Patch] TocBackend

2006-04-20 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
I found myself using more and more the two ways toc navigation but, eventually I got annoyed by the slowness of it. So I fixed it :-) This patch implements a Toc backend (TocBackend.[Ch]) that is used in toc.h. The speed improvement is _very_ very nice on windows. I guess it should be sensible