> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:05:45AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
>
>> On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:27, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> > LatexParam"4|revnumber"
>
> ...
>
>> > Does this make sense?
>>
>> Completly. :-)
>>
>> > - Martin
>>
>> --
>> José Abílio
>
>
> Patch
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:03:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
> Jose'> Jean-Marc, any objection?
>
> No, go ahead.
>
> JMarc
So done. (I was a bit in a hurry, in less than an hour our mail system
goes down for the weekend. Installing new spam/virus pumps :-( )
- Martin
pgp
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Friday 14 November 2003 11:25, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> Patch attached.
Jose'> I support your patch. This effectively means that now there
Jose'> are at least 2 persons who understand this code. :-) And, as
Jose'> Einstein said
On Friday 14 November 2003 11:25, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> Patch attached.
I support your patch.
This effectively means that now there are at least 2 persons who understand
this code. :-)
And, as Einstein said once, I don't know who is the third. ;-)
> I'll check it in later today if no o
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:05:45AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:27, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> > LatexParam"4|revnumber"
...
> > Does this make sense?
>
> Completly. :-)
>
> > - Martin
>
> --
> José Abílio
Patch attached.
I'll che