Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > IMHO let people use
| > std::for_each, at least you would have to change the api so that
| > functors are usable.
|
| True... It works for only one kind of functor (void func(T&)). I just
| wanted to hear opinion on that. The reason I have introdu
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Having said that, I don't suppose that I'd lose too much sleep if
| > the foreach declaration remained in it_vector.h but I'd be less happy
| > to see it remain as an it_vector member function.
|
| Let's wait if any
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Having said that, I don't suppose that I'd lose too much sleep if
| > the foreach declaration remained in it_vector.h but I'd be less happy
| > to see it remain as an it_vector member function.
|
| Let's wait if anybody else has an opinion on that
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Having thought about it some more, I realise that I'm actually
perfectly happy with
it_vector::iterator it1 = ...;
int pos = ...;
it_vector::iterator it2 = it1 + pos;
However, I'm surprised that operator+ t
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Angus Leeming a écrit :
> > So, operator+ advances the iterator but operator- tells you how
> > far it would go but does nothing? That doesn't seem right.
> > Can you explain the rationale?
> vector::iterator has these operators which does essential
Hello,
For those interested, here is a second version of the it_vector class.
With former one an assertion is triggered whenever you try to export to
latex. It seems that the at() method is used beyond the size() limit. I
am really not sure but there is maybe a hidden bug somewhere in the
"ex
Angus Leeming a écrit :
[...]
So, operator+ advances the iterator but operator- tells you how
far it would go but does nothing? That doesn't seem right.
Can you explain the rationale?
vector::iterator has these operators which does essentially that
(advance) and distance but list::iterator doe
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't contributed anything yet but I of course agree to license any
> contributions that I make to LyX under the Gnu General Public License,
> version 2 or later.
Thanks.
Angus
Here follows a quick review...
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> template
> class it_vector
> {
> class iterator: public Container::iterator
> {
> public:
So, operator+ advances the iterator but operator- tells you how
far it would go but does nothing? That doesn'
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdel, have you posted a message to this list to say that you agree to license
any contributions that you make to LyX under the Gnu General Public License,
version 2 or later? If not, please do so.
I haven't contributed anything yet but I of course agree to license any
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please find attached to this mail my refined patch for the ParagraphList
> rewrite problem. This patch makes "ParagraphList" derive from
> "it_vector >"
Abdel, have you posted a message to this list to say that you agree to license
any contribution
Dear lyx developers,
Please find attached to this mail my refined patch for the ParagraphList
rewrite problem. This patch makes "ParagraphList" derive from
"it_vector >"
"it_vector" is a new template class that implement the vector alike
container. It is defined in "it_vector.h". I don't know
12 matches
Mail list logo
