Re: [Patch] Moving functionality into layouts

2003-12-31 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:11:38AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Monday 29 December 2003 17:58, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > How do you plan to do this? A list of layouts that accept a given > > > CharStyle? > > > > Yes... as a parameter within that CharStyle definition. "AllowedIn" or

Re: [Patch] Moving functionality into layouts

2003-12-30 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 29 December 2003 17:58, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > How do you plan to do this? A list of layouts that accept a given > > CharStyle? > > Yes... as a parameter within that CharStyle definition. "AllowedIn" or > something, with a comma separated arg list. IMHO we should follow the way dtd

Re: [Patch] Moving functionality into layouts

2003-12-29 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 12:29:57PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: > > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> See the attached. The idea is to make it possible to use > Martin> LatexParam more flexibly to add attributes to opening tags. > Martin> Work i

Re: [Patch] Moving functionality into layouts

2003-12-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> See the attached. The idea is to make it possible to use Martin> LatexParam more flexibly to add attributes to opening tags. Martin> Work in progress. Martin> OK to commit? What does the # in latexparam mean? Do you really nee

[Patch] Moving functionality into layouts

2003-12-28 Thread Martin Vermeer
See the attached. The idea is to make it possible to use LatexParam more flexibly to add attributes to opening tags. Work in progress. OK to commit? - Martin PS Also for your info I attach the AGU template file I am using for testing all this (and making the screenshot). It isn't quite good eno