On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 06:59:05AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The save way would be to split the "CursorRight" into "CursorRight" and
> "PlainCursorRight", the first being just a call to the latter and a
> 'setCursor'...
We have too many things like this already (believe me)
john
--
"It's a
I guess this might qualify as "elementary support for 'word count'".
No recursion into insets, but I could do that as well.
Idea ok?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Index: LyXAction.C
=
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 07:05:27AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:16AM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > According to a friend's fiancee studying Law, you lose one mark for
> > every word you go over, too. So in that case being able to customise the
> > word count to b
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:14:59PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Definitely not in 1.3. But people seem to like to have a word count
> [Is this really _that_ interesting?]
It's pretty important for a lot of things, yes.
> Concerning the "visual": I guess the setCursor() should be remove from the
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:12:58PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Oh, a wish for a decent set of iterators in lyx.
Definitely not in 1.3. But people seem to like to have a word count
[Is this really _that_ interesting?]
Concerning the "visual": I guess the setCursor() should be remove from the
cursor
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:10:16AM +0930, Darren Freeman wrote:
> According to a friend's fiancee studying Law, you lose one mark for
> every word you go over, too. So in that case being able to customise the
> word count to be anally correct would be essential because those
> bastards will actuall
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:06:33PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I guess this might qualify as "elementary support for 'word count'".
> No recursion into insets, but I could do that as well.
>
> Idea ok?
IMHO, no. This traverses the document visuall, does it not ?
Oh, a wish for a decent set
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:19:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Concerning the "visual": I guess the setCursor() should be remove from the
> > cursor movement functions and called "manually" only in those places where
> > it _really_ needed
>
> There Be Dragons.
The save way would be to split
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 03:44, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:12:58PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Oh, a wish for a decent set of iterators in lyx.
>
> Definitely not in 1.3. But people seem to like to have a word count
> [Is this really _that_ interesting?]
It is when you are to
