Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:49:14PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Monday 22 December 2003 13:12, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > Next attempt, fresh screenshot (in the earlier announced place) > > No further objections. :-) > > > - Martin > > -- > José Abílio It's in. - Martin pg

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 22 December 2003 13:12, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Next attempt, fresh screenshot (in the earlier announced place) No further objections. :-) > - Martin -- José Abílio

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:45:31AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > > That we are on the right track. :-) > -- > José Abílio Next attempt, fresh screenshot (in the earlier announced place) - Martin Index: layouts/agu_stdclass.inc

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 22 December 2003 09:40, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Neither have I... would a simple blue label without the <> do better? > Possibly with a colon ("AGU-journal: ") That I like, also the point is to be consistent for all styles. The principle os least surprise. > Perhaps for Title and A

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:03:53AM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Monday 22 December 2003 08:39, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > > Here is some further work on the AGU header. It starts looking really > > good now. See > > > > http://www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/agu_pic.jpeg > > > > (some changes

Re: [Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 22 December 2003 08:39, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Here is some further work on the AGU header. It starts looking really > good now. See > > http://www.hut.fi/~mvermeer/agu_pic.jpeg > > (some changes were made after that still) I don't like your notation for the display name, it

[Patch] AGU header work

2003-12-22 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:11:02PM +, Jose' Matos spake thusly: > On Wednesday 17 December 2003 16:15, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > In docbook the whole header-like stuff is at the same depth as the > > > usual sections for that style ( section for articles and chapters for > > > book) so th