Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:41:17AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I guess Bakefile could do it, but any way to get compilation and linking > > with Visual Studio working would allow me to work on LyX. I'm itching to > > work on it again, but I do not have much time. > > In all seriousness, if you

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:46:55PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > In general, autoconf is not prepared for handling a prefix with > > spaces. I am not sure whether we could find a way to avoid doing > > that... > > Windows has two ways to refer to a path > C:\PROGR

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-15 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > >In all seriousness, if you are interested in working on LyX under Visual > >Studio, then why not take this on? > > Fair enough. Is the CVS source ready for Visual Studio now? I.e. are all > windows patc

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> In all seriousness, if you are interested in working on LyX under Visual >> Studio, then why not take this on? > > Fair enough. Is the CVS source ready for Visual Studio now? I.e. are all > windows patches merged? No. Attached is the remaining

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-13 Thread Asger Ottar Alstrup
Angus Leeming wrote: In all seriousness, if you are interested in working on LyX under Visual Studio, then why not take this on? Fair enough. Is the CVS source ready for Visual Studio now? I.e. are all windows patches merged? Regards, Asger

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Asger Ottar Alstrup wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>>PS: does anyone know about bakefile? >>>http://bakefile.sourceforge.net/ >> >> If this is what it takes to get Asger on board, then I'm all for it ;-) > > I guess Bakefile could do it, but any way to get compilati

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-13 Thread Asger Ottar Alstrup
Angus Leeming wrote: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: PS: does anyone know about bakefile? http://bakefile.sourceforge.net/ If this is what it takes to get Asger on board, then I'm all for it ;-) I guess Bakefile could do it, but any way to get compilation and linking with Visual Studio working would a

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-13 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > PS: does anyone know about bakefile? > http://bakefile.sourceforge.net/ If this is what it takes to get Asger on board, then I'm all for it ;-) -- Angus

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> The following patches improve the situation of windows packaging. Angus> I see you committed it. I'll test it out. Angus> Run 1. Explicit specification of the prefix as I'm guessing Angus> that you c

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: The following patches improve the situation of windows packaging. I see you committed it. I'll test it out. Run 1. Explicit specification of the prefix as I'm guessing that you concentrated on getting the implicit prefix to work first. $ ../configure --prefix='J:/Progr

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> In general, autoconf is not prepared for handling a prefix with >> spaces. I am not sure whether we could find a way to avoid doing >> that... Angus> Windows has two ways to refer to a path C:\PROGRA~

Re: [PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > In general, autoconf is not prepared for handling a prefix with > spaces. I am not sure whether we could find a way to avoid doing > that... Windows has two ways to refer to a path C:\PROGRA~1\Perl\bin\ C:\Program Files\Perl/bin\ so the packager could just use the

[PATCHes] some fixes for --with-packaging=windows

2005-01-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
The following patches improve the situation of windows packaging. The patch to ./configure.ac (HEAD) and config/lyxinclude.m4 are straightforward. The new mkinstalldirs for 1.3.x make wonders too. The patch to lib/configure.m4 is unrelated, as the patch for tex2lyx/Spacing.h (HEAD). In the 'frag