Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> That's not a nice thing to say on non-Fridays. What are we Andre> supposed to answer on such a statement... There is no rule saying that you are supposed to be nice on days other than friday! JMarc

Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 04:18:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Near a computer and able to commit something > > Ah, so you wanted me to commit it? You did it already, didn't you? Just the parts within src/mathed. > It seems I'm a bit slow to day... That's not a nice thing to sa

Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Even more amazing, the updated code compiles on my box. Well Angus> almost. Attached are two small patches, one to get LyX to Angus> compile and one to make the lyxGUI instance in lyx_main.h Angus> private. There are no repurcussio

Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:58:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: The rest looks ok, too. But Jean-Marc is near I think Andre> ;-) >> Near what? Note that I will probably not compile much with cxx >> until next septembe

Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:58:06PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> The rest looks ok, too. But Jean-Marc is near I think ;-) > > Near what? Note that I will probably not compile much with cxx until > next september. Near a computer and able to commit something Andre' -- André Pön

Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:02:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Even more amazing, the updated code compiles on my box. Well >> almost. Attached are two small patches, one to get LyX to compile >> and one to make the lyxGUI insta

Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:26:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | I've committed the mathed stuff (changed ostream to iostream, we have not > | made the distinctions so far even if it should be correct to do so). > > Change it again, this time to LOstream.h, and if that does not work it >

Re: [PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:02:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Even more amazing, the updated code compiles on my box. Well almost. Attached > are two small patches, one to get LyX to compile and one to make the lyxGUI > instance in lyx_main.h private. There are no repurcussions associated wit

[PATCHES]: to compile on a dec + ...

2001-12-10 Thread Angus Leeming
I've been away for a week and return to find 450 new lyx-related messages in my inbox. Wow! Even more amazing, the updated code compiles on my box. Well almost. Attached are two small patches, one to get LyX to compile and one to make the lyxGUI instance in lyx_main.h private. There are no rep