Committed this version.
Bernhard Roider wrote:
> there is an error in the previous patch. of course i would suggest
> this one.
>
> bernhard
>
>
> Index: insetbibtex.C
> ==
I'll look at this later and give it a test, then commit if it's OK.
rh
Bernhard Roider wrote:
> there is an error in the previous patch. of course i would suggest
> this one.
>
> bernhard
>
>
> Index: insetbibtex.C
> ==
there is an error in the previous patch. of course i would suggest this one.
bernhard
Index: insetbibtex.C
===
--- insetbibtex.C (revision 17723)
+++ insetbibtex.C (working copy)
@@ -373,13 +373,20 @@
return true;
}
+
+ enum c
Hello,
i failed to test the parser with older lyx documents...
I would suggest not to use the two functions readKey and readType because then readType is used to
read a key of a string entry - which makes the code harder to read. I would suppose the attached patch.
Bernhard
Richard Heck wro
Bernhard,
Do you want to comment on this? Have a look especially at the bits about
entryDelim. At first, I thought I'd caught a typo---"{" getting paired
with ")"---but then I realized that entryDelim never actually got used.
So I think it can just be removed, as in the diff. Otherwise, I think
t