Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-24 Thread José Matos
On Friday 24 January 2003 16:40, Dr. Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > > > > Well, given that lyx changes its release numbering scheme every release > > > > Hey, can the next one be 1.IV? And then the fix releases would be 1.IV.a, 1.IV.b... We have the linux style, the fetchmail style and now

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-24 Thread Dr. Richard E. Hawkins
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:05:28PM +, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:38:40AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Why not use the same option for specifying either a lyx version or a > > file format? It is not like we are going to release LyX 215 one of > > these days... > W

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-22 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:38:40AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Why not use the same option for specifying either a lyx version or a > file format? It is not like we are going to release LyX 215 one of > these days... Well, given that lyx changes its release numbering scheme every release

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> But 2.15 or 2.10 is reasonable. ;-) And yes those are valid José> values regarding the fileformat and also accepted. José> Then we will let a latent bug that will manifest itself when José> we get those version. Then I will tell you

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:01:02AM +, José Matos wrote: >> Ok, I will modify the patch for it. Andre> I have no troubles using different options to differnt things. Andre> And as you notices, 2.15 is well within reach. It shou

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-22 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 10:06, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:01:02AM +, José Matos wrote: > > Ok, I will modify the patch for it. > > I have no troubles using different options to differnt things. And as you > notices, 2.15 is well within reach. From beginning I w

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:01:02AM +, José Matos wrote: > Ok, I will modify the patch for it. I have no troubles using different options to differnt things. And as you notices, 2.15 is well within reach. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not ha

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-22 Thread José Matos
On Wednesday 22 January 2003 09:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Why not use the same option for specifying either a lyx version or a > file format? It is not like we are going to release LyX 215 one of > these days... But 2.15 or 2.10 is reasonable. ;-) And yes those are valid values regardi

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> This patch: * updates the version of lyx2lyx to match the José> corresponing lyx version; * updates the reference to the José> copyright date. * adds two new options to list the supported lyx José> versions, and allow to specify it inste

Re: [PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-21 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 18:35, José Matos wrote: > This patch: > * updates the version of lyx2lyx to match the corresponing lyx version; > * updates the reference to the copyright date. > * adds two new options to list the supported lyx versions, and allow to > specify it inste

[PATCH] lyx2lyx helper

2003-01-21 Thread José Matos
This patch: * updates the version of lyx2lyx to match the corresponing lyx version; * updates the reference to the copyright date. * adds two new options to list the supported lyx versions, and allow to specify it instead of the final file format. * if both the file