Michael Gerz wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>
>>>-N_("theight%"), N_("pheight%"), "" };
>>>+N_("Text Height %"), N_("Page Height %") };
>>>
>>>
>>Sorry, but I did only notice this now: You forgot the final "". Please
>>fix.
>>
>>
>
> I didn't forget it. It wasn't there before.
Georg Baum wrote:
-N_("theight%"), N_("pheight%"), "" };
+N_("Text Height %"), N_("Page Height %") };
Sorry, but I did only notice this now: You forgot the final "". Please fix.
I didn't forget it. It wasn't there before.
Anyway, I will commit in a few seconds.
Micha
Michael Gerz wrote:
> -N_("theight%"), N_("pheight%"), "" };
> +N_("Text Height %"), N_("Page Height %") };
Sorry, but I did only notice this now: You forgot the final "". Please fix.
Georg
Georg Baum wrote:
I have a nervous feeling that these strings are parsed somewhere. If you
made sure that that is not the case then this is a good change. I would
maybe even go further and use real language like e.g. "page width %" (or
capitalized?)
I checked that the string are handled corre
Michael Gerz wrote:
> How about this change?
I have a nervous feeling that these strings are parsed somewhere. If you
made sure that that is not the case then this is a good change. I would
maybe even go further and use real language like e.g. "page width %" (or
capitalized?)
Georg
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| How about this change?
If you have looked at the result in the gui and figure it ok, then
sure.
--
Lgb
How about this change?
Index: lengthcommon.C
===
--- lengthcommon.C (Revision 14449)
+++ lengthcommon.C (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -46,18 +46,9 @@
char const * const unit_name_gui[] = {
N_("sp"), N_("pt"), N_("bp"), N_("dd")
