Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:54:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
Dunno haven't see it, you forgot the attachment ;-)
ha! that's one of my favorites!
Here is the attachment corresponding to my first mail.
Got it but next time, if the patch is not
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 11:54:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Guillaume Pothier wrote:
> >>Dunno haven't see it, you forgot the attachment ;-)
> >
> >ha! that's one of my favorites!
> >Here is the attachment corresponding to my first mail.
>
> Got it but next time, if the patch is not very
Right, so here is the patch that adds begin() and end() methods
instead of returning (a copy of...) the buffer vector.
g
On 10/6/06, Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
>> Dunno haven't see it, you forgot the attachment ;-)
>
> ha! that's one of my favorites!
>
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
Dunno haven't see it, you forgot the attachment ;-)
ha! that's one of my favorites!
Here is the attachment corresponding to my first mail.
Got it but next time, if the patch is not very big please don't compress
it. It's easier for review.
Index: src/bufferlist.C
=
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
Dunno haven't see it, you forgot the attachment ;-)
ha! that's one of my favorites!
Here is the attachment corresponding to my first mail.
Lars begin() and end() solution seems sound.
Okay, what would be the return type? (sorry, my C++ is 10 years old)
Would it be
Dunno haven't see it, you forgot the attachment ;-)
ha! that's one of my favorites!
Here is the attachment corresponding to my first mail.
Lars begin() and end() solution seems sound.
Okay, what would be the return type? (sorry, my C++ is 10 years old)
Would it be vector::const_iterator?
Or
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
I always say that a short solution is probably a good solution but it's
a bit too short here ;-)
Short it is indeed! The problem is not *that* complex... What do you
think it lacks?
Dunno haven't see it, you forgot the attachment ;-)
Maybe another solution would b
I always say that a short solution is probably a good solution but it's
a bit too short here ;-)
Short it is indeed! The problem is not *that* complex... What do you
think it lacks?
Maybe another solution would be to add a method that returns the
number of available buffers, and use getBuffer(
"Guillaume Pothier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| The BufferList class currently provide the first(), next(Buffer *) and
| previous(Buffer *) methods for iterating on the buffers. These methods
| cycle through the buffer list, which makes iteration a bit more
| complicated than it should
Guillaume Pothier wrote:
Hi,
The BufferList class currently provide the first(), next(Buffer *) and
previous(Buffer *) methods for iterating on the buffers. These methods
cycle through the buffer list, which makes iteration a bit more
complicated than it should be.
I propose to add a getBuffers(
Hi,
The BufferList class currently provide the first(), next(Buffer *) and
previous(Buffer *) methods for iterating on the buffers. These methods
cycle through the buffer list, which makes iteration a bit more
complicated than it should be.
I propose to add a getBuffers() method that returns a co
11 matches
Mail list logo
