On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 12:53:11PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> ??? what do you wanted to fix in there?
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
> And don't you look at the patch
> files before you send them?
I did (unless there was about 40 lines of "? randomstuff.diff" in it.
I just miss
On 07-Mar-2002 John Levon wrote:
> try LFUN_INSET_TEXT without the patch and LFUN_CORE shall be revealed
> unto you.
#:O)
> Did I accidentally leave the changes to insertInsetAndEdit in the patch
> ?
> please don't apply that bit, it's for turning the selection into an
> inset (and is probably
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:59:10AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > can exist by itself. But let's hear what Jürgen says.
>
> Well it CAN exist by itself but I agree that now it is not neccessary
> anymore to have it. I needed this for testing the insettext, but I think
> we now have enough testi
On 07-Mar-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Anyway I pretty much agree with this patch since an InsetText never
> can exist by itself. But let's hear what Jürgen says.
Well it CAN exist by itself but I agree that now it is not neccessary
anymore to have it. I needed this for testing the insette
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| without removing this, you can make lyx core with it. So let's get
| rid of it (what was it supposed to do anyway ?)
What is the LFUN_CORE you talk about?
Anyway I pretty much agree with this patch since an InsetText never
can exist by itself. But let's
without removing this, you can make lyx core with it. So let's get
rid of it (what was it supposed to do anyway ?)
john
--
I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be
forever marked as such.
Index: src/BufferView_pimpl.C
===
