Le 15/12/2015 18:40, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:45:41PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> It turns out that there was a bad bug in f3cdf74e68bd : this commit
>> introduced a static variable used as a cache. This is a bad idea for
>> QObjects, as explained in the c
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 04:45:41PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> It turns out that there was a bad bug in f3cdf74e68bd : this commit
> introduced a static variable used as a cache. This is a bad idea for
> QObjects, as explained in the commit log of patch below.
>
> Comments welcome.
I
It turns out that there was a bad bug in f3cdf74e68bd : this commit
introduced a static variable used as a cache. This is a bad idea for
QObjects, as explained in the commit log of patch below.
Comments welcome.
JMarc
>From 283c24df12537f83d837fc28ef9797af46e8a75f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Fr