On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:49:35PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:24:16AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Is it correct that there are only seven bugs left?
>
> Well, I would also like to see the page-down across table regression
> fixed, but unless someone steps up ...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:45:41AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is my last try to get this patch into the LyX repository!
Can you make a bug on bugzilla and attach the patch please ?
assign it to me too
regards
john
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:24:16AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Is it correct that there are only seven bugs left?
Well, I would also like to see the page-down across table regression
fixed, but unless someone steps up ...
john
--
"ALL television is children's television."
- Richard A
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:50:10PM +, John Levon wrote:
> Search bugzilla for a target milestone of 1.3.0. There's not really any
> Qt bugs left, other than the Preamble menu thing
Is it correct that there are only seven bugs left?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > (You can help, you know :-) )
|
| I do what I can Lars
I am not sure how to take this comment, but just for the record, I
have no intention in pushing you into doing something you do not have
the time for nor any great interest in.
Your spare time is
> (You can help, you know :-) )
I do what I can Lars
Ed.
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue Dec 17, 2002 17:50, John Levon wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:42:00AM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> > where can I find a list of outstanding qt bugs that need to be addressed
>> > before 1.3?
>>
>> Search bugzilla for a target milestone of 1.
On Tue Dec 17, 2002 17:50, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:42:00AM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > where can I find a list of outstanding qt bugs that need to be addressed
> > before 1.3?
>
> Search bugzilla for a target milestone of 1.3.0. There's not really any
> Qt bugs left, othe
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 05:54:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I read that it fixes this one:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295
Mmm, but I didn't know why.
> As soon as it goes into 1.4.0cvs, it will go in 1.3.1cvs too.
Fine by me
john
--
"ALL television is children's te
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:42:00AM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> where can I find a list of outstanding qt bugs that need to be
>> addressed before 1.3?
John> Search bugzilla for a target milestone of 1.3.0. There's not
John> really any
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:25:50AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> Did you look at the patch? I think this will surely not introduce
>> any bugs I would opt to include it now (just my opininon).
John> It doesn't fix an actual bug.
I rea
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:42:00AM +, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> where can I find a list of outstanding qt bugs that need to be addressed
> before 1.3?
Search bugzilla for a target milestone of 1.3.0. There's not really any
Qt bugs left, other than the Preamble menu thing
john
--
"ALL televisi
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:25:50AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Did you look at the patch? I think this will surely not introduce
> any bugs I would opt to include it now (just my opininon).
It doesn't fix an actual bug.
regards
john
--
"ALL television is children's television."
- Ric
> we should only be fixing things on the
> release-critical list ...
where can I find a list of outstanding qt bugs that need to be addressed
before 1.3?
Thanks, Ed.
John Levon wrote:
Ping me again just after 1.4.0cvs opens and I'll apply it.
Did you look at the patch? I think this will surely not introduce
any bugs I would opt to include it now (just my opininon).
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jür
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 01:53:53AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >AFAIK, you didn't send a patch for CVS 1.3 when we asked. And it is
>
> ??? It was you who wrote the patch ???
I understand that you modified it though :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&m=103133345712767&w=2
Anyway,
John Levon wrote:
AFAIK, you didn't send a patch for CVS 1.3 when we asked. And it is
definitely too late now - we should only be fixing things on the
release-critical list ... or important regressions that pop up.
??? It was you who wrote the patch ???
Michael
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:45:41AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> this is my last try to get this patch into the LyX repository!
AFAIK, you didn't send a patch for CVS 1.3 when we asked. And it is
definitely too late now - we should only be fixing things on the
release-critical list ... or impor
Hello,
this is my last try to get this patch into the LyX repository!
The patch is used to display a smallskip/medskip/bigskip in textual form
(more WYSIWYM, slightly less WYSIWYG). I consider it very difficult to
distinguish a bigskip from a medskip on screen.
This patch is a direct adaption
19 matches
Mail list logo