Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Done. Just to trunk.
>
> If nobody complains, I believe it should go to branch later.
I'm fine with that (in case this still matters).
Jürgen
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think it should be applied to trunk.
>>
> Done. Just to trunk.
If nobody complains, I believe it should go to branch later.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch deals with a UI bug that's been discussed here.
The effect is this: If you try to open a file that is already open,
LyX (i) checks if the buffer is dirty, and just switches buffe
Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>>
>> The attached patch deals with a UI bug that's been discussed here.
>> The effect is this: If you try to open a file that is already open,
>> LyX (i) checks if the buffer is dirty, and just switches buffers if
>> it is not; (ii) i
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch deals with a UI bug that's been discussed here. The
effect is this: If you try to open a file that is already open, LyX (i)
checks if the buffer is dirty, and just switches buffers if it is not;
(ii) if it is, you get this message:
The document %1$s is
The attached patch deals with a UI bug that's been discussed here. The
effect is this: If you try to open a file that is already open, LyX (i)
checks if the buffer is dirty, and just switches buffers if it is not;
(ii) if it is, you get this message:
The document %1$s is already loaded and ha
