Re: [PATCH] Re: broken_headers.h

2004-11-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | gettext is supposed to handle its own tests. Lars> Perhaps it is now, but did it use to? I know that LyX itself used to need these functions, long long ago. Gettext does not use HAVE_foo variables for these particular functions.

Re: [PATCH] Re: broken_headers.h

2004-11-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> You are sure this is not needed by something else? gettext | Lars> f.ex.? > | gettext is supposed to handle its own tests. Perhaps it is now, but did it use to? But go ahe

Re: [PATCH] Re: broken_headers.h

2004-11-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> You are sure this is not needed by something else? gettext Lars> f.ex.? gettext is supposed to handle its own tests. JMarc

Re: [PATCH] Re: broken_headers.h

2004-11-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Therefore I propose the following cleanup patch. While I was at it, I | removed all traces of strcmp, memset and memmove. > | Comments? > | JMarc > > | Index: configure.ac | === | RCS

Re: [PATCH] Re: broken_headers.h

2004-11-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Comments? Georg> Can't test (have no broken system ;-) ), but it looks good. Since these systems are SCO unix and SunOS4, I think we do not care much :) JMarc

Re: [PATCH] Re: broken_headers.h

2004-11-29 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Comments? Can't test (have no broken system ;-) ), but it looks good. Georg

[PATCH] Re: broken_headers.h

2004-11-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Am Samstag, 27. November 2004 15:01 schrieb Lars Gullik Georg> Bjønnes: >> Do we really need this header file anymore? >> >> And if we do, shouldn't we just handle this in the >> configure/config.h instead? Actually BROKEN_HEADERS i