Re: (Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

2006-08-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I think so personally. I'll shove it in later today if I get no objections. > After it gets good testing, it could even go in > 1.4.x. Yes, would be nice. I'll port it back to my working version of 1.4, where it'll get some real life testing. Jürgen

Re: (Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

2006-08-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> I don't care. I named it DISSOLVE to please Lars and you. The Juergen> attached patch also is improved in the way that it restores Juergen> the cursor position. Juergen> OK to go in trunk? I think so personally. After i

Re: (Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

2006-08-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > (I remember though also having code to dissolve an inset when pressing > Delete in last position.) Trivial. See, here the extra effort in code already pays off. > I don't like the name -- easily misunderstood. DISSOLVE or MELT would be > better. I don't care. I named it D

(Inset dissolve patch) Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

2006-08-07 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I didn't bother to save it properly > > It's in the archieves: > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg84275.html Great! (I remember though also having code to dissolve an inset w

Re: [PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

2006-08-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Martin Vermeer wrote: | > I didn't bother to save it properly | | It's in the archieves: | http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg84275.html | | However, I prefer the attached. A bit more code, but cleaner. And I think it's |

[PATCH] Re: Footnote to normal text

2006-08-07 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Martin Vermeer wrote: > I didn't bother to save it properly It's in the archieves: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel%40lists.lyx.org/msg84275.html However, I prefer the attached. A bit more code, but cleaner. And I think it's worth to reserve an lfun for it. Opinions? Jürgen Index: src/LyX