Isn't that what I was suggesting a few days ago? Well, not quite,
since I was suggesting we just put them all on the menu so that
they're all there to be chosen from, on an ad hoc basis, rather than
making the user go into the preferences or settings or something to
change them. JMarc, what
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to record all
available programs of a sort in alternative RCs.
I would love to have that for converters, so that configure.py
configures all available converters/viewers,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to record all
>> available programs of a sort in alternative RCs.
>
> I would love to have that for converters, so that configure.py
> configures all available converters/viewers, not only the first one that
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to record all
> available programs of a sort in alternative RCs.
I would love to have that for converters, so that configure.py
configures all available converters/viewers, not only the first one that
fits.
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> if you implement only additional parameters for programs detected by
> configure and then run some kind of execvp call rather than the normal
> system call, no additional program can be run that way.
Thanks.
Here comes the first step. This implements the possibility to recor
