On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:00:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> So I agree they shouldn't be selectable in the UI, they are an internal
> detail, right ?
Yes.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:39:32PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> They insert true negative space on screen as opposed to \! which is drawn
> as blue |___|.
Right.
> Having these things is useful to correct drawings of certain compounds as
> long as LyX's own rendering differs from LaTeX's.
So
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:33:06PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:44:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > My doing... I found them in math spaces so assumed that that's what they
> > were. Were would you put them, if anywhere?
>
> Nowhere. It's likely to go if I found
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:35:39PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> What do they do ?
They insert true negative space on screen as opposed to \! which is drawn
as blue |___|.
Having these things is useful to correct drawings of certain compounds as
long as LyX's own rendering differs from LaTeX's.
An
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> But users who are used to some bindings do not care about consistency.
> Of course we have the right to change all bindings and menus at each
> release, but we should not underestimate the amount of grumpiness this
> will gen
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:35:17PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > And as this is strictly undocumented I'd like to see your cheetah that
> > managed to type \lyxnegspace ;-}
>
> Not any more... they are now on the math spaces sub-panel ;-}
What do they do ? What have you called them ?
regard
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:44:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> My doing... I found them in math spaces so assumed that that's what they
> were. Were would you put them, if anywhere?
Nowhere. It's likely to go if I found some clean solution...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:18:50PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Not any more... they are now on the math spaces sub-panel ;-}
>
> Not my doing hopefully. They really should not be there.
>
> Andre'
My doing... I found them in math spaces so assumed that that's what they
were. Were would
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:35:17PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > And as this is strictly undocumented I'd like to see your cheetah that
> > managed to type \lyxnegspace ;-}
>
> Not any more... they are now on the math spaces sub-panel ;-}
Not my doing hopefully. They really should not be ther
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:04:40PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> And as this is strictly undocumented I'd like to see your cheetah that
> managed to type \lyxnegspace ;-}
Not any more... they are now on the math spaces sub-panel ;-}
Martin
msg44990/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Hmmm... you mean those that have been using the keyboard
Martin> shortcut? All three of them :-) (and yes, I was one of them.)
Make that 4. And remember that this is the official way documented in
the tutorial.
Martin> I think
On Thursday 19 September 2002 15:17, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > - case LFUN_EMPH: handleFont(bv, cmd.argument, "mathcal");
> > > break; + case LFUN_EMPH: handleFont(bv, cmd.argument, "emph");
> > > break;
> >
> > I think you'll get angry users here
>
> Hmmm... you mean those
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:17:49PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Try inserting one of these beasts into a document from the math spaces
> panel, and then latex it.
Ah yes... it should probably add a \def\lyxnegspace{} in validate.
But it should be only used in the second box of macro definition
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:49:02PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:35:37PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Another thing: I ran into a bug in math_fontinset. If you have two
> > fontinsets inside each other, only the outer one calls validate.
>
> Yes. It should call
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:35:37PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Another thing: I ran into a bug in math_fontinset. If you have two
> fontinsets inside each other, only the outer one calls validate.
Yes. It should call MathNestInset::validate() as well.
> This will lead e.g. to a LaTeX process
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:18:29AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Just use LFUN_MATH_INSERT \mathbf here and drop the new LFUNs and I'd say
> it is ok until 1.4...
>
> Andre'
Done.
I did some extra clean-up in lyxfunc.C, as lines 634-663 appear to be
unnecessary now... math and non-math are han
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:07:12PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Okay, here is a clean solution. With this, the math panel produces the
> \math?? font commands, while the familiar font commands for text mode
> (found on the layout m
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:30:59PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 04:51:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I don't even use any font lfun from qt math panel.
> >
> > But perhaps you shoul
18 matches
Mail list logo
