> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:12:22AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> > Should we then add some testing against the available qt libs ?
> > Does that need to go in config/qt.m4 or in configure.in ?
>
> we should prefer a library called qt2 to one called qt, but fall
> back to qt if it fails.
>
> The
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:12:22AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
> First Q. of course: do you want LyX to compile out-of-the-box
> on a FreeBSD system as well? I hope the answer is positive.
of course
> Should we then add some testing against the available qt libs ?
> Does that need to go in config/
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:15:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> > but this is only because on FreeBSD they have elected to call the qt
> > lib qt2... that is not the case on RedHat.
>
> erm, oh yeah (brain crisis).
>
> So I need to change it to prefer qt2 to qt
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:15:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> + * sp_base.h: add an include
>
> because of what?
compile error, it should be possible to include this file "alone" like
we do in qt2. It was complaining about pid_t
>
> but the is only because on FreeBSD they have el
Patch + ChangLogs attached.
Modifications to config/qt.m4, src/sp_base.h and their ChangLogs.
Rob.
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:31:50PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > Could the attached patch solve the problem to at least compile
> > the present qt2 parts?
> > (
