Re: [PATCH] Minor Renaming

2008-11-10 Thread rgheck
José Matos wrote: On Monday 10 November 2008 08:33:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Obviously I would not object. Even if we decide to change these methods later, we'll know at least what we are talking about. +1 Committed, then. rh

Re: [PATCH] Minor Renaming

2008-11-10 Thread José Matos
On Monday 10 November 2008 08:33:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Obviously I would not object. Even if we decide to change these methods > later, we'll know at least what we are talking about. +1 > JMarc -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH] Minor Renaming

2008-11-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone object to the attached? JMarc recently noted that this method is > misnamed. Obviously I would not object. Even if we decide to change these methods later, we'll know at least what we are talking about. JMarc

[PATCH] Minor Renaming

2008-11-09 Thread rgheck
Anyone object to the attached? JMarc recently noted that this method is misnamed. rh Index: src/insets/InsetBranch.cpp === --- src/insets/InsetBranch.cpp (revision 27368) +++ src/insets/InsetBranch.cpp (working copy) @@ -232,7 +23

[PATCH] Minor Renaming

2008-11-09 Thread rgheck
Anyone object to the attached? JMarc recently noted that this method is misnamed. rh