On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:53:05AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Michael Gerz wrote:
> > No objections?
>
> Well, I think inset-dissolve does not need a menu entry. It's bound to two
> keys (delete in the first inset position, backspace in the last), I think
> that's enough. The menus ten
Juergen Spitzmueller schrieb:
Well, I think inset-dissolve does not need a menu entry. It's bound to two
keys (delete in the first inset position, backspace in the last), I think
that's enough. The menus tend to be overloaded anyway.
No, it definitely needs a menu entry - for the reason why w
Michael Gerz wrote:
> No objections?
Well, I think inset-dissolve does not need a menu entry. It's bound to two
keys (delete in the first inset position, backspace in the last), I think
that's enough. The menus tend to be overloaded anyway.
But I have another candidate:
Item "Phonetic Symbols|y
Michael Gerz schrieb:
Hello,
LyX 1.5 has so many nice features but we are hiding them from the user.
The patch below adds a few of the "pearls" to the menus. Any comments?
Jean-Marc, should we also add some entries to 1.4.3 (in particular
accept/reject-change which are quite basic operations!
Hello,
LyX 1.5 has so many nice features but we are hiding them from the user.
The patch below adds a few of the "pearls" to the menus. Any comments?
Jean-Marc, should we also add some entries to 1.4.3 (in particular
accept/reject-change which are quite basic operations!)
BTW: Most features
