Re: [PATCH] Make boost work better when BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined

2003-03-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> The following patch fixes some compilation problems when | Lars> BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined (as we do in LyX). These concern Lars> OpenBSD | (first hunk: when BOOST_NO_WRE

Re: [PATCH] Make boost work better when BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined

2003-03-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The following patch fixes some compilation problems when | BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined (as we do in LyX). These concern OpenBSD | (first hunk: when BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined we end up including | ) and something I found when trying to compile with

[PATCH] Make boost work better when BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined

2003-03-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
The following patch fixes some compilation problems when BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined (as we do in LyX). These concern OpenBSD (first hunk: when BOOST_NO_WREGEX is defined we end up including ) and something I found when trying to compile with lyxstring (no need to define compare_string(wstring,wcha