>
> apologies for the post to self, but I got a reply from the guy and it
> seems I misunderstood him. The kdevelop branch can be used for both
> versions, but not Qt Designer. So it seems there isn't an available dialog
> editor :(
>
Well you tried ;)
> Juergen, I tried *very* hard to use Qt
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, John Levon wrote:
> Yes. I actually had a mail over the weekend from someone who implied Qt
> Designer can generate Qt 1.1 only code, which wasn't at all clear from the
> tarball of Qt 2.2.beta. If this is true, then we can switch to using that,
> and everyone is happy :)
>
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > 1) As I pointed out, layout isn't handled by kdlgedit. So this
> >doesn't use it. Is this OK ?
>
> Is this the geometry stuff you were referring to for the copyright dialog?
>
Yes. I actually had a mail over the weekend from someone who implied Qt
D
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, John Levon wrote:
> Here is an implementation of KDE FormUrl. The patch should apply
> maybe with a little fuzz, the other files go in the obvious places.
>
> I have some design queries and comments.
I'll answer a few now and try to get back to the others later.
> 1) As I
Here is an implementation of KDE FormUrl. The patch should apply
maybe with a little fuzz, the other files go in the obvious places.
I have some design queries and comments.
1) As I pointed out, layout isn't handled by kdlgedit. So this
doesn't use it. Is this OK ?
2) The source is split
