Re: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-14 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:14:06PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote: > > > This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing > > > crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo

Re: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-14 Thread John Levon
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote: > > This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing > > crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo > > the layout, and remove the widget > > Just disable it then. You

RE: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-14 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 13-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > >> There is still the Changelog missing in the diff-file please resubmit! >> > > sorry, I thought it was as other projects, where the changelog doesn't go > in the diff so there's not syncing problems between patches

Re: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-13 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote: > This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing > crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems difficult to get Qt to redo > the layout, and remove the widget Just disable it then. You don't have to make the KDE port work and look just

Re: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jürgen | | P.S.: Lars did you already give John cvs rights? No, but I will. Lgb

Re: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-13 Thread John Levon
On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > It is not that I am ignoring it. More that I don't have time to look > into this right now. of course, sorry to suggest otherwise > Anyway if you want to help you should use the > XForms frontend first and help make that work. Then we should check >

RE: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-13 Thread John Levon
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > There is still the Changelog missing in the diff-file please resubmit! > sorry, I thought it was as other projects, where the changelog doesn't go in the diff so there's not syncing problems between patches. New one with Changelog diff included. Sorry

RE: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-13 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 13-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote: > 2000-09-13 John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * src/frontends/kde/Makefile.am > * src/frontends/kde/FormRef.C > * src/frontends/kde/FormRef.h > * src/frontends/kde/formrefdialog.C > * src/frontends/kde/formrefdialog.h: implement

Re: [PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, I've confirmed it's not KDE code that's causing the weirdness with | NEW_INSETS defined. I see you ignored my previous comments so I must be | saying something really stupid :( It is not that I am ignoring it. More that I don't have time to look int

[PATCH] KDE FormRef

2000-09-13 Thread John Levon
Lars, I've confirmed it's not KDE code that's causing the weirdness with NEW_INSETS defined. I see you ignored my previous comments so I must be saying something really stupid :( This is 95%, as there is still a big hole when we edit an existing crossref, and we hide the refs list. It seems dif