Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> btw, how should we introduce source-latex only for view->dvi? a
>> latexflavour?
>
> Your pet project surfaces again? Why not try and put a few thoughts
> down on e-paper about how it might be implemented and we can knock
> some ideas around.
On Monday 20 October 2003 19:27, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> > btw, how should we introduce source-latex only for view->dvi? a
> > latexflavour?
>
> Your pet project surfaces again? Why not try and put a few thoughts
> down on e-paper about how it might be implemented and we
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> btw, how should we introduce source-latex only for view->dvi? a
> latexflavour?
Your pet project surfaces again? Why not try and put a few thoughts
down on e-paper about how it might be implemented and we can knock
some ideas around.
Angus (back from a long w/e in a
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I hope that's lib/configure rather than $top/configure. The effect
> shouldn't be compiled into LyX.
Exactly. ... it would be so nice if some autoconfigure-knowledgeable good
soul had a look (existence of srcltx.sty/availiability of --source-specials
option to latex)...
>
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Undesirability? I get lots of warning messages when generating
Angus> previews for a file with \usepackage{srcltx} in the preamble.
Angus> Dunno if that's something to bear in mind or not.
Warnings about specials can usually be sup
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:54:25PM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Lyx should work with a number of latex distributions, in many versions
> etc. It is hard to predict what will be the behavior of each one, and
> _maybe_ implementing a dialog like I sugested could be simpler and more
> re
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> > I think that the frontends should have a dialog with a tri-state
> > (radio) button as this:
> >
> > Inverse DVI search:
> > [ ] Disable
> > [ ] Latex option [ --src-specials ] <- text box
> > [ ] Package
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:11:34PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> it? Can it collide with other packages etc? (maybe a checkbox to supress it
> after all?).
It can potentially screw up the spacing, but I don't know if this is indeed
a problem.
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
>> The patch attached plus the two files socket_callback.{C,h}, that
>> must be placed under src/frontends/qt2, solve add qt support (don't
>> forget to run autogen/configure). The files socket_callback.{C,h}
>> _really_ need to be ch
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> The patch attached plus the two files socket_callback.{C,h}, that must be
> placed under src/frontends/qt2, solve add qt support (don't forget to run
> autogen/configure). The files socket_callback.{C,h} _really_ need to be
> checked by someone that understands q
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
> Things still missing:
>
> - qt support
The patch attached plus the two files socket_callback.{C,h}, that must be
placed under src/frontends/qt2, solve add qt support (don't forget to run
autogen/configure). The files socket_callback.{C,h} _reall
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> And finaly Angus, as promised, lyxclient.man. Can someone check my
> horrible english?
Your english is not worse than mine (but that means nothing so no help here)
The patch works as advertised. Can I apply it (or someone else)?
Unfortunately, my xdvi (stock r
Hello all,
These patches implement the idea of seting the socket address using
environment variables.
putenv.diff is a necessary patch to putenv. Environment variables must
be allocated.
export-socket.diff makes LyXSocketServer export the variables XEDITOR (for
xdvi) and LYXSOCKET (for lyxclien
13 matches
Mail list logo
