Re: [PATCH] InsetTableCell

2008-03-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:25:26AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:24:06AM -0400, rgheck wrote: >> >>> OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a bit, >>> but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bug

Re: [PATCH] InsetTableCell

2008-03-21 Thread Richard Heck
Andre Poenitz wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:24:06AM -0400, rgheck wrote: OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a bit, but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bugs here. But the general idea seems to work. Note that this is intended to

Re: [PATCH] InsetTableCell

2008-03-21 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:24:06AM -0400, rgheck wrote: > > OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a bit, > but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bugs here. > But the general idea seems to work. > > Note that this is intended to be a "minimal p

[PATCH] InsetTableCell

2008-03-20 Thread rgheck
OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a bit, but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bugs here. But the general idea seems to work. Note that this is intended to be a "minimal patch", involving as few changes as possible to the existing cod