On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 11:25:26AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:24:06AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
>>
>>> OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a bit,
>>> but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bug
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:24:06AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a bit,
but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bugs here.
But the general idea seems to work.
Note that this is intended to
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:24:06AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
>
> OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a bit,
> but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bugs here.
> But the general idea seems to work.
>
> Note that this is intended to be a "minimal p
OK, here's my attempt once again to fix bug 2178. I've tested this a
bit, but I'm not an extensive user of tables, so I'm sure there are bugs
here. But the general idea seems to work.
Note that this is intended to be a "minimal patch", involving as few
changes as possible to the existing cod