Re: [PATCH] Inline Spellchecker

2006-05-28 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Hello Félix-Antoine, since there were only a few answers so far (which does not mean that your effort is not appreciated!), I'll do, even if my knowledge on the area you're working is limited. Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais wrote: > In February, I wrote about my intention to code a patch to implemen

Re: [PATCH] Inline Spellchecker

2006-05-27 Thread Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais
> I don't think you should run the spellcker when loading a document. Every text processor does it. If we don't, we will have an inconsistent representation of wrong/correct words. For example, should you save a document and re-open it, every underlined mistake will be gone until you move the c

Re: [PATCH] Inline Spellchecker

2006-05-22 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | In February, I wrote about my intention to code a patch to implement an inline | (on the fly) spellchecker for LyX (see bug 718). | | This is a preliminary version of the patch. There is still a lot of things | missing but before I cont

[PATCH] Inline Spellchecker

2006-05-20 Thread Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais
In February, I wrote about my intention to code a patch to implement an inline (on the fly) spellchecker for LyX (see bug 718). This is a preliminary version of the patch. There is still a lot of things missing but before I continue, I want your opinion and your advice. 1. My principal concern