On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:49:37PM +, Andreas Vox wrote:
>
> Sorry, that's what happens if I use anything but vi to edit changelogs.
>
> Forgiven?
Certainly. :-)
The whole exercise was just to show you that small patches are a lot
easier to deal for all of us. :-)
And also that we rea
Josà AbÃlio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:38:56AM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I bundled those extra since they relate to all other patches.
> > This time I didn't erase any blanks but replaced all blanks
> > by double blanks, as is required
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:38:56AM +0200, Andreas Vox wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I bundled those extra since they relate to all other patches.
> This time I didn't erase any blanks but replaced all blanks
> by double blanks, as is required for the Changelog format ;-)
Aha, not quite. :-)
But nevermind
Hi!
I bundled those extra since they relate to all other patches.
This time I didn't erase any blanks but replaced all blanks
by double blanks, as is required for the Changelog format ;-)
Josè, could you commit these patches? I want to go on with
the allowedNameChars runparam, DBTeXMath, calling
'e
