Re: [PATCH] Bug 5850

2009-03-12 Thread rgheck
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: rgheck schreef: I'd rather not just restore the setBuffer calls, since doing so means going through the entire document and setting every single inset's buffer_ member every time we call updateLabels(), which just seems excessive. So I instead propose the attach

Re: [PATCH] Bug 5850

2009-03-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
rgheck schreef: I'd rather not just restore the setBuffer calls, since doing so means going through the entire document and setting every single inset's buffer_ member every time we call updateLabels(), which just seems excessive. So I instead propose the attached. Hmm.. it still feels like

[PATCH] Bug 5850

2009-03-12 Thread rgheck
I'd rather not just restore the setBuffer calls, since doing so means going through the entire document and setting every single inset's buffer_ member every time we call updateLabels(), which just seems excessive. So I instead propose the attached. The action here is in the addition of anoth