Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>"Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>
> Herbert> John Keane wrote:
>
>>>Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The
>>>new features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far.
>>>Great job. One problem I
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> John Keane wrote:
>> Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The
>> new features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far.
>> Great job. One problem I had importing Lyx1.1.6 documents is that
>>
> "John" == John Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> It's a personal preference, as my colleagues don't use Lyx, so
John> revisions have to be made on latex files - it's nice if they're
John> as simple as possible.
I agree with that. We would be interested too by patches that make the
l
John Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> but we can handle this in an easier way, because the
>> default (the Reference Point) is not cc (center)
>> but lB (leftBaseline)
>
| ok, I see, I guess setting the default value to lB should have the same
| ef
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> but we can handle this in an easier way, because the
> default (the Reference Point) is not cc (center)
> but lB (leftBaseline)
ok, I see, I guess setting the default value to lB should have the same
effect. I still prefer my patch, as it minimizes the
KDozer wrote:
> if (!params().rotateOrigin.empty()) {
> options << " origin=" << params().rotateOrigin[0];
>
> if rotateOrigin="" then the latex code is
>
> includegraphics[]
>
> which is treated differently by graphicx.sty
yes, you're right. Sorry ...
but we can handle this in an
Hi,
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> this is from graphicx.sty
>
> \define@key{Gin}{origin}[c]{%
>\def\Gin@erotate{\Grot@box@kv[origin=#1]}}
>
> which means, that the default is origin=c. Why should there be a
> difference when running without this option?
>
This just means t
John Keane wrote:
>
> Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The new
> features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far. Great job.
>
> One problem I had importing Lyx1.1.6 documents is that Lyx 1.2.0 insists
> on specifying a rotation origin to includegraphi
Hi,
Firstly, let me say that I'm really impressed with Lyx 1.2.0. The new
features are great, and it has been very stable for me so far. Great job.
One problem I had importing Lyx1.1.6 documents is that Lyx 1.2.0 insists
on specifying a rotation origin to includegraphics. The default 'origin=c'
