On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 17/10/2014 18:56, Alfredo Braunstein a écrit :
>>
>> I see. IMO the LFUN way is preferable. I'll give one use case where I
>> would find this useful: when writing a document with length
>> constraints (e.g. # words, # chars), it wou
Le 17/10/2014 18:56, Alfredo Braunstein a écrit :
I see. IMO the LFUN way is preferable. I'll give one use case where I
would find this useful: when writing a document with length
constraints (e.g. # words, # chars), it would be nice to have the
information accessible through a shortcut on the st
It's a nice idea, thanks. I once tried something like this for my own
use, but I gave up because the precise counting is picky and journal
dependent, e.g. for aps journals:
http://journals.aps.org/authors/length-guide-faq
They want the footnotes, but don't want the bibliography nor figures
and equa
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> I see. IMO the LFUN way is preferable. I'll give one use case where I
> would find this useful: when writing a document with length
> constraints (e.g. # words, # chars), it would be nice to have the
> information accessible through a shortcut on the status bar (instead
Just tested and you're right.
A/
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>> Btw, it would be also nice to have selection-bound statistics (e.g. in
>> some journals / grant calls there are rigid bounds for each section or
>> part).
>
> IIRC statistics dialo
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Btw, it would be also nice to have selection-bound statistics (e.g. in
> some journals / grant calls there are rigid bounds for each section or
> part).
IIRC statistics dialog will give you selection-count already. P
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> I see. IMO the LFUN way is preferable. I'll give one use case where I
> would find this useful: when writing a document with length
> constraints (e.g. # words, # chars), it would be nice to have the
> information accessible through a sh
I see. IMO the LFUN way is preferable. I'll give one use case where I
would find this useful: when writing a document with length
constraints (e.g. # words, # chars), it would be nice to have the
information accessible through a shortcut on the status bar (instead
of going to where the inset was in
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The problem with insetinfo is that havbing to update this information at
> every keystroke can be expensive, unless of course the value is not shown
> in the edit window (but then you know that this is the next thing people
> would ask for...).
Bummer indeed.
> OT
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Sorry for the dumb question, but what is InsetInfo good for (in terms
> of usecase). It seems like a very strange concept IMHO. Why can't it
> be e.g a dialog or a panel?
It's part of the document and it will be printed, so dialog won't work.
Originally for shortcuts, n
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 17/10/2014 04:09, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> What usecase lead to this lfun? If the point is to store this info in
>> document
>> more proper way would be insetinfo.
Sorry for the dumb question, but
Le 17/10/2014 09:57, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 17/10/2014 04:09, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hi,
There has been quite a bit of discussion on lyx-fr on the
possibility of
reading the statistics of a document for further processing. As a
result,
Stéphane Mourey im
Le 17/10/2014 04:09, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hi,
There has been quite a bit of discussion on lyx-fr on the possibility of
reading the statistics of a document for further processing. As a result,
Stéphane Mourey implemented a new LFUN, server-get-statistics. If there i
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There has been quite a bit of discussion on lyx-fr on the possibility of
> reading the statistics of a document for further processing. As a result,
> Stéphane Mourey implemented a new LFUN, server-get-statistics. If there is
> no objection, I am going to pu
On 10/15/2014 07:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Hi,
There has been quite a bit of discussion on lyx-fr on the possibility
of reading the statistics of a document for further processing. As a
result, Stéphane Mourey implemented a new LFUN,
server-get-statistics. If there is no objection,
aa3ca9d2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: brokenclock
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 21:55:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add LFUN_SERVER_GET_STATISTICS command
This function can be used with the LyX server to obtain the word, character or character+space count in the current document or selection.
---
lib/
16 matches
Mail list logo
