On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:34:45AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | What do you mean ?
>
> Actuall compiler messages.
I'll back out my patch when the box is next up and I have some time and
post the messages for you.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the s
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:23:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> | Feel free. You note I didn't apply the patch.
>>
>> thanks.
>
| Well, it's up to you, or somebody else ... or it can stay broken. I'm
| not too bothered ...
yeah I have noticed...
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:23:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Feel free. You note I didn't apply the patch.
>
> thanks.
Well, it's up to you, or somebody else ... or it can stay broken. I'm
not too bothered ...
> | It was ambiguous overloads in the first place
>
> What then?
What d
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:01:18AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> Ok, you fix the sympthoms. I do not think that this should be fixed
>> with cases, but by using correct types.
>>
>> beginningOfBody should probably return a pos_type.
>
| Feel free.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:01:18AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Ok, you fix the sympthoms. I do not think that this should be fixed
> with cases, but by using correct types.
>
> beginningOfBody should probably return a pos_type.
Feel free. You note I didn't apply the patch.
> using casts
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is what I needed to compile LyX on IA-64
>
| Mostly int != long stuff.
Ok, you fix the sympthoms. I do not think that this should be fixed
with cases, but by using correct types.
beginningOfBody should probably return a pos_type.
using casts with to
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:13:55AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Does the compilation actually fail or do you just get warnings? (Just
> interested. On the Dec I just get warnings.)
Failures. There's no max(one_type, different_type) which iis what it is
on 64 bit, etc.
john
--
Khendon's Law:
John Levon wrote:
> This is what I needed to compile LyX on IA-64
> Mostly int != long stuff.
Does the compilation actually fail or do you just get warnings? (Just
interested. On the Dec I just get warnings.)
Ok this is a fail. I think we should go back to a template tostr.
Things like this ar
This is what I needed to compile LyX on IA-64
Mostly int != long stuff.
regards
john
? a.diff
Index: src/lyxrow_funcs.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/lyxrow_funcs.C,v
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -a -p -r1
