On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> Op 26-4-2013 4:05, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
>>> wrote:
Op 1-4-2013 6:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 26-4-2013 4:05, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Op 1-4-2013 6:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
I think this is something I need to get used to: I woul
Op 26-4-2013 4:05, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 1-4-2013 6:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
I think this is something I need to get used to: I would not have
thought that this duplication of code (e.g. reparsing the string in
the same w
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 1-4-2013 6:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>> I think this is something I need to get used to: I would not have
>> thought that this duplication of code (e.g. reparsing the string in
>> the same way) was a good solution but I do see
Op 1-4-2013 6:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Op 30-3-2013 6:08, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
The following command now throws an error:
lyx -dbg doesNotExist
NOTE: THIS PATCH IS INCOMPLETE. I think I have the right condition
for
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 30-3-2013 6:08, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>>
>> + // Search for an explicit name
>>
>> + bool foundMatch = false;
>> + for (int i = 0 ; i < numErrorTags ; ++i)
>> +
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Op 30-3-2013 6:08, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
>
>> The following command now throws an error:
>>
>>lyx -dbg doesNotExist
>>
>> NOTE: THIS PATCH IS INCOMPLETE. I think I have the right condition
>> for detecting the error, but I do
Op 30-3-2013 6:08, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
+ // Search for an explicit name
+ bool foundMatch = false;
+ for (int i = 0 ; i < numErrorTags ; ++i)
+ if (tmp == errorTags[i].name) {
+
Op 30-3-2013 6:08, Scott Kostyshak schreef:
The following command now throws an error:
lyx -dbg doesNotExist
NOTE: THIS PATCH IS INCOMPLETE. I think I have the right condition
for detecting the error, but I don't know what to do with it.
I see two ways of throwing an error:
(1) create a new
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The following command now throws an error:
>
> lyx -dbg doesNotExist
>
> NOTE: THIS PATCH IS INCOMPLETE. I think I have the right condition
> for detecting the error, but I don't know what to do with it.
>
> I see two ways of throwing an
The following command now throws an error:
lyx -dbg doesNotExist
NOTE: THIS PATCH IS INCOMPLETE. I think I have the right condition
for detecting the error, but I don't know what to do with it.
I see two ways of throwing an error:
(1) create a new enum value for Type, THROWERROR, which
LyX.cpp
11 matches
Mail list logo
