Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-30 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:56:50AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, it will be used to fix all the stupid bugs we'll add in 1.3.0. > And 1.3.2 will be used also for this. See 1.2.1: I accepted too much > new code in it, and it had 3 new bad bug. This is definitely bad. Fair enough john

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:49:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes John> wrote: >> I belive this would be a nice feature for 1.4, I am very reluctant >> of John> Can you remind me of the versioning scheme ? Are we having a John> 1.3.1 ? Yes

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:49:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I belive this would be a nice feature for 1.4, I am very reluctant of Can you remind me of the versioning scheme ? Are we having a 1.3.1 ? The 1.4 is the one that's coming out in about 2004, right ? If we are lucky. > includ

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:09:32PM +, John Levon wrote: > >> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: >> > > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz > | btw, screenshot : http://movementarian.org/lc.png (ignore the pink ;) I b

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread José Abílio Oliveira Matos
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 17:45, John Levon wrote: > > btw, screenshot : http://movementarian.org/lc.png (ignore the pink ;) Impressive if I may say so. BTW you mean salmon not pink. ;-) > john -- José Abílio

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:09:32PM +, John Levon wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > > > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz btw, screenshot : http://movementarian.org/lc.png (ignore the pink ;) john -- "All photography is accurate - none of it

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:12:29AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz > > Sure this is right? Yes. Upgrade wget. john -- "All photography is accurate - none of it is truth." - Richa

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:38 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > is a >> (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple > revision >> tracking mode for LyX. It's agai

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:09:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > If you post me (privately) your configure script,

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > >> is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple > >> revision tracking mode for LyX.

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:38 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > > is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple > > revision tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. > > I still can't compile 1.2 CVS Me neither. In my

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: >> is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple >> revision tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. Andre> I still can't compile 1.2 CVS I have to

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-29 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple revision > tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. I still can't compile 1.2 CVS Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not h

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz Sure this is right? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

[PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking

2002-10-28 Thread John Levon
Here : http://movementarian.org/changes.diff.bz2 is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple revision tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. To use it, you'll need to install Erich Frühstück's new dvipost package (install the sty, and put ltxpost in your $PATH). http://mo